Difference between revisions of "Talk:Equipment/Primary Weapons"

From UFO:AI
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 15:02, 15 July 2009

Do we really need a new model for the plasma-grenade shell? AFAIK we already have one in svn. It seems to be a modification of the default (frag) shell though. Which isn't generally a bad thing, since I imagine the shape needs to still fit into the same weapon. --Hoehrer

See the related bug report on SF.


Hey. I think you really did a great job on all the emails from research, very atmospheric. However about the particle weaponry, Cdr. Navarre abruptly contradicts himself when he says that it is "miniaturised far beyond our ability to duplicate", and yet most of it is "nothing that we can't duplicate easily with enough money and effort". He is probably supposed to refer only to the particle accelerator in the first part. But for one he does not say that (e.g. "parts of it"), and for another he cannot know, as the final research proposal clearly states that they cannot tell what's inside the ammo source in the first place. Even more so, the fact that it is impossible to duplicate is not certain prior to completion of that very project. I'd suggest to remove the "beyond our ability" part, or replace it with something less foresighted, like "not understood".

Vio 13:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)